Code Pink and the MSM
When a prominent anti-war group changes its position on whether or not American troops should be pulled out of Afghanistan, you would think typically anti-war media outlets would be all over the news.
Apparently not, for a Christian Science Monitor article published Tuesday concerning Code Pink's change of heart on the war in Afghanistan mysteriously generated very little media attention.
Before exploring why that might be, here were the shocking details:
Though Afghans have their grievances against the international troops' presence, chief among them civilian casualties, many fear an abrupt departure would create a dangerous security vacuum to be filled by predatory and rapacious militias. Many women, primary victims of such groups in the past, are adamant that international troops stay until a sufficient number of local forces are trained and the rule of law established. (Read more about Afghan women's concerns here.)
During their weeklong visit here, in which they met with government officials, politicians, ministers, women activists, and civil society groups, the small team of Code Pink members had hoped to gather evidence to bolster their call for US troop withdrawal within two years, and capitalize on growing anxiety back home about the war.
While the group hasn't dropped its call for a pullout, the visit convinced them that setting a deadline isn't in Afghanistan's interests, say Ms. Benjamin and fellow cofounder Jodie Evans.
"We would leave with the same parameters of an exit strategy but we might perhaps be more flexible about a timeline," says Benjamin. "That's where we have opened ourselves, being here, to some other possibilities. We have been feeling a sense of fear of the people of the return of the Taliban. So many people are saying that, 'If the US troops left the country, would collapse. We'd go into civil war.' A palpable sense of fear that is making us start to reconsider that."
Wow. Seems like big news, right?
Not exactly. According to LexisNexis, no other newspaper besides the Monitor published this revelation in print.
As for the Internet, the Los Angeles Times Top of the Ticket blog wrote about it Wednesday.
On television, CNN and Fox News addressed this a number of times Tuesday and Wednesday respectively.
And that's it.
Quite a difference from when George W. Bush was President and any time these folks said a word the media would be all over it.
This raises an obvious question: why?
As NewsBusters and the Media Research Center have been writing about for the past few months, anti-war stories have been well under the press's radar since Bush left the White House.
With the new president claiming shortly after his inauguration that Afghanistan is a war of necessity, the Obama-loving media seemed disinterested in giving attention to remaining dissenters.
As such, one would think a prominent anti-war group reversing course and making the case for troops staying would fit the present media template unless the view is that Obama might be reversing course himself.
As a result, Code Pink's change of heart may be bad timing for a president about to change his own.
Whatever the reason, the press's lack of interest on this one is sure to raise some eyebrows.
—Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters. Follow him at Facebook and Twitter.
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically
Comment by Ed— 2009/10/29 @ 03:55 PM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/10/29 @ 04:14 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2009/10/29 @ 04:40 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/10/29 @ 05:11 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Burns— 2009/10/29 @ 07:13 PM — (Reply)
The women of Afghanistan certainly do need help, but the women of Code Pinko need to shut up and let the military experts do what they do best. If Code Pink wants to take care of the helpless and weak, they can start right here in the US with protecting the unborn!
The msm won't raise a stink about it until the NYT puts it on the front page.
Comment by Jen— 2009/10/30 @ 04:00 PM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/10/30 @ 04:10 PM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/10/30 @ 04:11 PM — (Reply)
watch for yourself !!!!!!!
Comment by aza spade— 2009/10/30 @ 04:17 PM — (Reply)
Comment by aza spade— 2009/10/30 @ 04:22 PM — (Reply)
Code Stink of Hypocrisy always was a DNC run commie anti-Bush political front.
Comment by FJ— 2009/10/31 @ 05:12 AM — (Reply)
I am getting frustrated with the total cluster that is the WH and the MSM.
Comment by Brooke— 2009/11/01 @ 05:12 AM — (Reply)
BG
Comment by Barry G.— 2009/11/01 @ 08:40 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2009/11/01 @ 06:49 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/11/01 @ 07:28 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/11/02 @ 01:25 PM — (Reply)
did you hear about Code Pink invading Joe Leiberman's office, claiming that 45,000 Americans die each year b/c of lack of healthcare?
Bwahahaha!
whatever. How do these Code Stink people pay their rent?? ugh....
Comment by Jen— 2009/11/05 @ 10:12 AM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/11/05 @ 11:21 AM — (Reply)
"we aint tarred and feathered nobody in a "while"..."
Well, it's a practice you Americans need to revive, if this is the state of play.
Condolences to all patriotic Americans, in the wake of the (who didn't see this coming) Texas slayings by ....you guessed it... a Muslim.
Comment by gravelrash— 2009/11/06 @ 02:30 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/11/06 @ 03:53 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/11/06 @ 03:54 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/11/06 @ 03:55 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2009/11/06 @ 06:30 PM — (Reply)
Comment by jim— 2009/11/07 @ 04:04 AM — (Reply)