Elmer's Brother

Paratus Ad Vitam Paratus Ad Mortis

2007/1/2

FATWA - NYT (3rd) and Abortion Industry

@ 09:07 AM (37 months, 23 days ago)

Michelle Malkin reports on the journalistic malfeasance of the New York Times. A woman in El Salvador was imprisoned for killing her child. The freelance reporter the NYT pimps got the story from said she was sentenced to 30 years for having an abortion. His source of information was a manufacturer of an abortion vacuum aspirators. The reporter could have got the story right by simply getting a copy of the court documents.

 And the Times doesn't have a bias.

This excerpt on the same story from Coffee Spy:

The thing is, in both the abortion story and Iraq reporting, the press is actually hurting its own cause.  When they report versions of the facts, instead of the facts, people begin to question and debate the press instead of the issue.  The Ace of Spades says it quite well:

We do need a vigilant press in this country to press uncomfortable questions to those in power. But if the press itself continues indulging in the same deny and lie spin cycle as any other organization caught dirty, how can it act in this role?

I started this blog because what I read in the paper rarely stood up to scrutiny.  Having been a low-level journalist myself I know how it’s supposed to be written.  Gather facts.  Order the facts by importance.  Rewrite them in that order, editing for flow and cohesiveness.  End of story.  It’s not that hard.  If any jackass with an internet connection can refute professional press reporting, it’s time to turn that ever-watchful eye upon the watchers themselves.

"I inform the proud dhimmi people of the world that members of the NYT and the abortion industrial complex and all involved in its malfeasant ways are sentenced to a life of appeasement, yellow bellied, red burka wearing dhimmitude."

Signed the Grand Ayatollah Mufti and Pubah EB

As always all are encouraged to issue their own fatwas.

Comment(s) »

  1. EB-Dhimmis wouldn't dare!:shock: I on the otherhand am not a dhimmi, and I won't behave like one either! I may get killed, but I won't go down like a yellow-bellied, lily-livered coward!:mad:

    tmw
    broach

    Comment by the merry widow— 2007/01/02 @ 09:36 AM — (Reply)

  2. as uh alfalfa would say "me needer"

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2007/01/02 @ 09:51 AM — (Reply)

  3. I reworded it a little tmw

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2007/01/02 @ 10:31 AM — (Reply)

  4. Remember, you can't be 'dhimmi' without being a little 'dhim' to begin with.

    Comment by Coffeespy— 2007/01/02 @ 11:20 AM — (Reply)

  5. you ain't lyin coffeespy!

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2007/01/02 @ 11:27 AM — (Reply)

  6. I'm glad you posted on this EB. It fascinates me that Liberal activists hurl the word "bigot" at conservatives when it is these same Libs who support negative eugenics with blatant support for (and propagandizing of) elective abortion.

    According to Planned Parenthood, the number of minority abortions in America is disproportionate to the general population figures.

    Comment by Cate— 2007/01/02 @ 01:15 PM — (Reply)

  7. Margaret Sanger the founder of Planned Parenthood saw abortion as a means to control the minority (mainly black) population.

    Ironic isn't it that the argument for abortion has been turned to prevent poor minorities from being poorer. Even more remarkable is that people bought into it.

    Comment by elmers brothe— 2007/01/02 @ 01:20 PM — (Reply)

  8. Ironic isn't it that the argument for abortion has been turned to prevent poor minorities from being poorer. Even more remarkable is that people bought into it. ...good posting EB!..u know libs ..they pick and choose which "killings' upset their delicate sensibilities...apparently babies arent on that list........

    Comment by Angel— 2007/01/02 @ 03:19 PM — (Reply)

  9. but poor, poor Saddam...

    Comment by Cate— 2007/01/02 @ 03:35 PM — (Reply)

  10. they know who's most important

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2007/01/02 @ 03:38 PM — (Reply)

  11. Perhaps the MSM should consider the whole freelance reporter thing. It seems that they loose credibility on a daily basis, and then shrug and say, "Well, it was just a freelance reporter."

    And I'm with Cate! Their priorities are appalling!

    Comment by Brooke— 2007/01/03 @ 06:46 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically