Elmer's Brother

Paratus Ad Vitem Paratus Ad Mortis

2006/12/20

Colbert is hilarious

@ 11:36 AM (18 months, 26 days ago)
Colbert didn't let Goodman run the show. (see Pt. 2 also)
 


 


Comment(s) »

  1. That's hilarious! :lol:

    Comment by Brooke— 2006/12/21 @ 06:55 AM — (Reply)

  2. I watch her/listen to her ALL the time. Bagdad Amy.

    Comment by Farmer John— 2006/12/22 @ 02:24 AM — (Reply)

  3. did you hear the phone caller on c-span call her amy osama bin goodman?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/22 @ 02:42 AM — (Reply)

  4. EB,
    Apologies, but I just tagged you!

    Comment by Always On Watch— 2006/12/22 @ 06:03 AM — (Reply)

  5. No I missed that...

    Mele Kalikimake, brah! No grinds too much kao-kao, oh you opu stay growing.

    Comment by Farmer John— 2006/12/22 @ 06:08 AM — (Reply)

  6. okay FJ had a little too much pineapple wine I see....my opu is doing just fine

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/22 @ 11:32 AM — (Reply)

  7. Democracy Now is my inspiration.

    Amy suggests that reporters shouldnt embed with US forces. That would mean that they would have to rely on the insurgents for protection. Reporters cant just walk around Iraqi warzones because the insurgents target them. So in order to do so they would have to negotiate with the terrorists and will be forced to compromise their "subjectivity".

    When embedded with US troops they are under no other condition than to refrain from giving out information that would reveal operational security and endanger the soldiers that they are embedded with.

    She clearly favors Iraqi terrorists to American troops and is willing to sacrifice her subjectivity in the name of "protecting" her subjectivity.

    Nice!!!!!!!!!!








    Comment by Freedom Now— 2006/12/22 @ 12:04 PM — (Reply)

  8. Ya think?

    Comment by Ernie Els— 2006/12/22 @ 12:13 PM — (Reply)



  9. Democracy Now is my inspiration.


    Fern, isn't it everybody's?

    Your "Dickens" post was excellent by the way.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/22 @ 12:27 PM — (Reply)

  10. EB,

    I hate to break it to you since you commended my last post so nicely, but I am concerned for your welfare.

    It is illegal to call me Fern. Only Nanc and TMW have that right. I'm just a good samaritan and I wanna make sure you dont get arrested.

    :wink:

    Comment by Freedom Now— 2006/12/23 @ 12:34 PM — (Reply)

  11. ah oh! FN sorry about that. I certainly don't want to upset either one of those ladies.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/23 @ 12:36 PM — (Reply)

  12. Whether a soldier says a war is worth it depends on what the soldier thinks justifies a war. For some, a war is to repel an attack on the US. The geopolitical intricacies of this conflict don't raise to the Pearl Harbor level for a lot of soldiers. If that were the standard, probably 90% of American conflicts wouldn't be "worth it."

    www.nelsonguirado.com

    By the way, how do I contact you?

    Comment by Nelson Guirado— 2006/12/30 @ 07:53 PM — (Reply)

  13. here is just fine neslson...I'm not sure who you are so I prefer some anonymity for awhile okay

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/31 @ 05:36 AM — (Reply)



  14. Whether a soldier says a war is worth it depends on what the soldier thinks justifies a war. For some, a war is to repel an attack on the US. The geopolitical intricacies of this conflict don't raise to the Pearl Harbor level for a lot of soldiers. If that were the standard, probably 90% of American conflicts wouldn't be "worth it."


    IMHO 9/11 was much worse than Pearl Harbor. 9/11 was an attack on innocent civilians as opposed to a military target.

    I'd be interested in what reference you cite for your statistics and whether or not you served. On what basis do you assert that it "wouldn't be worth it"?

    Otherwise based on my experience, 20 years in the Navy and how well I know my comrades in arms I'd say you were way off base.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/31 @ 08:32 AM — (Reply)

  15. whether a soldier decides a conflict is "worth it" is in some ways a moot point. We do our duty as we have sworn to do it.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/31 @ 08:54 AM — (Reply)

  16. You misunderstood. I'm not opposed to the war and I was there last year (I'm an officer in the Army reserve). I'm just saying that soldiers may say that the war is unjustified because some hold on to the romantic notion that the only conflicts that are morally justified are those in which we repel an invader. This war isn't like that and some soldiers fail to grasp its larger significance-or, more commonly, don't think about it at all.

    Comment by Nelson Guirado— 2006/12/31 @ 09:30 AM — (Reply)

  17. I apologize nelson I understand now and thanks for the clarification

    Thanks for your service my family and I owe you a debt

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/12/31 @ 10:27 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically