Imam on USAirways flight had ties to OBL and Hamas
Ms. Millard...dig it....dig it hard.
Omar Shahin, one of the imams removed from the plane, has links to Osama bin Laden and Hamas. "Five clerics removed from US Airways fly back to Phoenix," by Martiga Lohn for Associated Press, with thanks to Twostellas:
Watch for the criminalization of investigations of Muslims in airports.
UPDATE: from ACAIR
The Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) has, once again, shown North America exactly where they stand on the issue of defending innocent human beings from the depredations of radical Islamic terrorists and
their supporters:
Six Muslim imams (Islamic holy men) were recently pulled from a US Airways flight due to concerns raised by fellow passengers. These concerns included:
- Making anti-American comments about the war in Iraq.
- Asking for seat belt extensions (even though a flight attendant did not believe they needed them).
- The six boarded the plane separately, except for one who needed assistance because he is blind.
Taken separately, none of these rises to the level where casual observers need become concerned. However, consider:
- The men were overheard making anti-American comments in the terminal before the flight. Why did they find it necessary to make the comments in the terminal, in the presence of fellow passengers? Was it simply a
case of bad behaviour or an attempt to call attention to their presence?
- Seat belt extensions are exactly what they are called; a means for overly large passengers to extend the reach of the normal seatbelts in order to make themselves more comfortable—and safe—for the flight. Seat
belt extensions would also make very handy weapons.
- While there is no rule that says Muslim passengers must sit together, it would seem very odd to any observer to see the men split up and sit apart when they had been a group in the terminal. Could this have
scared passengers who remembered the same tactic was used on 9-11 to commandeer the doomed airliners that hit New York, Washington D.C., and Pennsylvania?
Omar Shahin, one of the “holy men” is a representative of the Kind Hearts Organization. Kind Hearts assets have been frozen while under investigation. Shahin has expressed doubts that Muslims are responsible for
the 9-11 attacks and says of Al-Qaida terrorist nests in America, “All of these, they make it up.” If Shahin is representative of the type of “holy men” that were taken off the airliner, then we can fully understand why law enforcement personnel were concerned enough about their presence to remove them.
CAIR’s response? Ibrahim Hooper, spokesperson for the Islamic terrorist supporting group, had this to say:
“Because, unfortunately, this is a growing problem of singling out Muslims or people perceived to be
Muslims at airports, and it's one that we've been addressing for some time.”
Hooper once again apologizes for radical Islam while pretending to be concerned about civil rights. He completely ignores the civil rights of the passengers who were intimidated by the rude and suspicious
behaviour of the six “holy men”.
Shahin had this to say, “"They know what they have to do, they have to be fair and just with everybody."
Shahin got his wish: he behaved like a Muslim terrorist and he was treated like one. What could be fairer than that?
Sources:
http://wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53057
http://www.dfw.com/mld/dfw/16069916.htm
Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR (ACAIR)
ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org
www.anti-cair-net.org
Comment(s) »
| Advertisement | what's this? |
| Your Ad Here with AdBrite | |
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically



















Someone might want to slip these imams a clue: Since a bunch of Muslims attacked us with our own airlines, folks are understandably a bit unnerved by Muslim displays anywhere near airports! DUH!
Comment by Brooke— 2006/11/24 @ 06:06 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Brooke— 2006/11/24 @ 06:07 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/11/24 @ 06:12 AM — (Reply)
Yo jocko....you are invited to spend Christmas with my family. We begin with dinner around five on Christmas even and then go to Church. We usually have about 10 for Christmas Eve. Christmas day is spent at home and more relatives come over so dinner is usally for about 14, plenty of room for you. More relatives come the day after, still plenty of room for you. You are invited for the whole deal jocko. You will like it. Several of the relatives enjoy debating heads off of pins.
Comment by Barry G.— 2006/11/24 @ 03:21 PM — (Reply)
my idea and it's a good one:
PUT EL AL ISRAEL IN CHARGE OF ALL U.S. AIRLINES!
all incidents of terror would cease. postehaste.
Comment by nanc— 2006/11/26 @ 12:18 AM — (Reply)
Nanc,
I like that idea!
Comment by Always On Watch— 2006/11/26 @ 10:53 AM — (Reply)
See "An Agenda Exposed." Last paragraph:
"It's also noteworthy that Ms. Pelosi and Rep. Conyers couldn't provide specific instances of Muslims' civil rights being abused when the House debated renewing the Patriot Act. It was so noteworthy that it raised red flags with veteran Capitol Hill reporters like Fred Barnes and Mort Kondracke. The lack of proof of any civil rights abuses won't deter Pelosi and Conyers from carrying CAIR's water once again. In fact, it's a safe bet that the Flying Imam Fiasco will be offered as proof positive that Muslims are being unfairly targeted and that they need civil rights relief."
And let's not forget about Conyers's House resolution which couldn't get out of committee--so far.
Comment by Always On Watch— 2006/11/26 @ 10:51 AM — (Reply)