Elmer's Brother

Paratus Ad Vitem Paratus Ad Mortis

2006/9/25

Osama bin Laden and 72 (She-Male) Virgins

@ 04:20 PM (23 months, 12 days ago)

Froggy's back and he's on a roll. Here is a snippet:

That’s right, based on recent exegesis of ancient Arabic manuscripts, some scholars are claiming that the Koran promises not just any old virgins, but 72 She-Male virgins, the big gnarly kind with man hands, five o’clock shadows and hairy bellies.

All the knuckleheads say they don’t hate America, they just hate President Bush. Wait a minute folks; President Bush is America, my America, an expression of American will. If they were to get rid of him, would they beat America? I think not. Will killing the Pope stop Catholicism? Nope. Neither will killing bin Laden stop the grumpy Muslims just frothing at the bit for their own little perverted den of paradise.

 

Comment(s) »

  1. Elmer, Elmer, Elmer...
    I guess I'm a knuclehead - cos I love America, greatest country in the history of earth - But Bush? Dude. What is it exactly that inspires you about him? His rags to riches story? His draft dodging? His C grade average when he was a member of Skull & Bones at Yale? His DWI's? His alleged coke snorting? His lying us into war? His shredding of the constitution? His great speech making? The way he bounced back from the pretzel choking?

    I think you're just pissed because the Steelers suck this year.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/25 @ 04:46 PM — (Reply)

  2. I think it's the way he sets people like you off.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/25 @ 04:55 PM — (Reply)

  3. lol someone had to do it.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/25 @ 04:58 PM — (Reply)

  4. but is that all? Really? I think it's possible to be a christian and a patriot who loves his country and to see the "president" as a bumbling, corrupt, war monger.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/25 @ 05:04 PM — (Reply)

  5. dugg, dugg, dugg, never implied that you couldn't be a patriot. 2% (10) of my 448 posts have spoken directly about Bush and one of those was about by disgust at his immigration policy. Straw man dugg that's what it is.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/25 @ 05:53 PM — (Reply)

  6. go to Froggy's and read the whole article Dugg...Bush isn't my hero but he's not the devil either.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/25 @ 04:57 PM — (Reply)

  7. He's not my devil - more like a satan imp.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/25 @ 04:59 PM — (Reply)

  8. His daddy's the devil. :lol:

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 02:43 AM — (Reply)

  9. the article is dealing with whether or not getting rid of osama would get rid of terrorism and he uses bush as an analogy. 271 huh?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/25 @ 05:54 PM — (Reply)

  10. I don't think getting rid of every Muslim on the planet would stop anything - they'd just pick someone else to demonize - probably Christians. They have to have a boogyman to make people have fear - otherwise they could never get away with half of the stuff they do.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 02:46 AM — (Reply)

  11. the article doesn't call for that....and the jihadis already
    hate Christians.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/26 @ 02:51 AM — (Reply)

  12. GETTING RID OF EVERY MUSLIM WOULD SURELY HELP !!!!! AND EVERY HOMO/LESBIAN, CHILD MOLESTER, RAPIST, "THUG", THUG WANNA BE, GANG MEMBER, AND ANYONE WITH LESS THAN 100 I.Q... AND ANY WOMAN WHO WANTS AN ABORTION MUST PROVE THE "FETUS" MAYBE SUSPECTED OF POSSESSING LESS THAN 100 I.Q. OH AND LETS NOT FORGET TO GET RID OF THE CRAP THEY CALL "RAP"....

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/26 @ 05:58 AM — (Reply)

  13. You're a rare guy, Jim - a con who tells the truth about his views. Spoken like a true Hitler youth.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 06:48 AM — (Reply)

  14. What makes you think all cons are like Jim? Or even most? Or even a measurable percentage? Get real.

    You're selling more propaganda than he is - at least his views are his own. You're pretending that he speaks for millions - didn't you accuse me of broad brushing all antiwar people as "leftists" just the other day???

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/26 @ 07:38 AM — (Reply)

  15. Sorry, Cate, you're right. Guilty as charged. Should have left the first sentence off.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 08:44 AM — (Reply)

  16. Very revealing insight about you, though Dugg... you really believe we all think that? And I thought you were above all the left/right political stuff.

    Hmmmmm....

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/26 @ 08:47 AM — (Reply)

  17. No, actually I was just trying to write something smart ass and only had a second and didn't think it through. I think both parties are equally bogus and corrupt - but I know there are good people who believe in both sides.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 08:50 AM — (Reply)

  18. WHO sez HITLER was ALLLL BADDD, SOMETHINGS he did was good !!!!

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/26 @ 08:22 AM — (Reply)

  19. uh huh. I thought it was pretty good when he killed himself. I find it very ironic that Hitler's mother was a jew (wich makes him a jew)- dude must have had a serious mommy complex.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 08:46 AM — (Reply)

  20. see already you've found SOMETHING about him you liked.

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/09/26 @ 09:21 AM — (Reply)

  21. i'm with you dugg the only thing he did right was rid us of himself.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/26 @ 12:36 PM — (Reply)

  22. I find your charge of conservative=Nazi rather amusing, because it totally lacks historical context.

    You will find more parallels to Nazi Germany (if you study history) and radical Islam.

    However, after over 700 years of peaceful coexistence, the true start of the Arab-Israeli conflict can be dated to 1920 and the rise of one man, Haj Amin Muhammad Al Husseini, the grand mufti of Jerusalem. As grand mufti, al Husseini presided as the Imam of the Al Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem, the highest Muslim authority in the British mandate.

    History shows Al Husseini to be a brutal man with aspirations to rule a pan-Arabic empire in the Middle East. He rose to prominence by actively eliminating those Jews and Arabs he considered a threat to his control of Jerusalem's Arab population, and he heavily utilized anti-Jewish propaganda to polarize the two communities.

    In 1920 and again in 1929, Al Husseini incited anti-Jewish riots by claiming the Jews were plotting to destroy the Al Asqa mosque. The riots resulted in the massacre of hundreds of Jewish civilians and a virtual end to the Jewish presence in Hebron.

    The 1936 Arab revolt against the British is believed to have been at least partially funded by Nazi Adolf Eichmann, and Al Husseini again ordered armed Arab militias to massacre Jewish citizens.

    When British authorities finally quelled the rebellion in 1939, Al Husseini fled to neighboring Iraq and helped to orchestrate a 1941 anti-British jihad. As in Jerusalem, the British successfully put down the rebellion and Al Husseini fled to Nazi Germany.

    Al Husseini found the Nazis to be a strong ideological match with his anti-Jewish brand of Islam, and schemed with Hitler and the Nazi hierarchy to create a pro-Nazi pan-Arabic form of government in the Middle East.


    The Grand Mufti went on to raise an Army for Hitler in what is now Yugoslavia made up of European Muslims. In March 1944, Al Husseini broadcast a call for a jihad to "kill the Jews wherever you find them. This pleases God, history, and religion."



    There are parallels such as these:

    1. anti-Semitism

    2. quest for world dominance

    3. demand for the total subordination of the free will of the individual

    4. belief in the abolishment of the nation-state in favor of a "higher" community (in Islam the umma or community of all believers; in Nazism, the herrenvolk or master race)

    5. belief in undemocratic governance by a "divine" leader (an Islamic caliph, or Nazi führer).

    For a better understanding I suggest watching the movie "Obsession".


    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/26 @ 01:35 PM — (Reply)

  23. Cut me some slack - I admitted it was a bad choice of words.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 04:11 PM — (Reply)

  24. if it was the first time...

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/09/26 @ 05:07 PM — (Reply)

  25. Or don't. The fact of the matter is - I apologized to Barry for saying that -he just pissed me off - and told Cate the same today. I don't think you are nazis. But it is a fact that nazi scientists were snuck into America - Prescott Bush - Schwarzanazi - Rove's grandpappy - I mean - I should of said neocon - not con. It just came out that way. My father/brothers/fatherinlaw are republicans - and I hardly think them nazis for it.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 05:17 PM — (Reply)

  26. Dugg,

    Forget the freudian :wink:

    WRT neocons and nazis - the list of similarities end after #1- both political ideologies

    National SOCIALIST Party (nazi) gained power by confiscating all things private and nationalizing them.

    These neocons that you hate advocate school choice through vouchers, privatization of social security, laissez faire economic policy, etc. My gosh, their bumbling leader even {gasp} gave us our own money back with tax reform.

    Leftist political ideologies are closer to Nazism - confiscation of private property/business (Chavez in Venezuela, Allende in Chile, etc.) In our own country, the left wants government intervention into parenting (for example: abortions for minors without parental notification), religion, schooling, you name it. In Australia they've even banned those free Gideon Bibles from hospitals (remember book-burning?).

    On domestic policy issues, neocons and nazis couldn't be further apart. Clearly, the idea that there are similarities arises from the belief that the USA is imperialistic rather than a liberating force for democracy. If that is so, then why don't we rule Japan? Germany? Why aren't we recapturing Cuba? How about Canada - I mean, they're right there - drinking bad beer and watching hockey... can you say Canadian Bacon?

    The comparison doesn't hold up on even the most minute levels.

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/26 @ 05:36 PM — (Reply)

  27. You're right - they're a breed all their own. Peace guys - catch you later.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 05:45 PM — (Reply)

  28. EVEDINTALLY HE "LOVED" JERUSALEM AND "DISIRED" TO POSSESS IT......BIBLICAL NO-NO.......

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/26 @ 02:27 PM — (Reply)

  29. There MUST be something in loose change on this subject. Please watch it again Dugg.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/09/26 @ 02:28 PM — (Reply)

  30. BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAAAAAAA

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/26 @ 02:50 PM — (Reply)

  31. Terror Storm, dude. It's the new Loose Change but better. The movie of the resistance!

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/26 @ 04:13 PM — (Reply)

  32. Hawking a new one Dugg? LOL. That wouldn't be because Loose Change does hold up under scrutiny would it?
    rebuttal of Loose Change

    Comment by Cate— 2006/09/28 @ 06:18 AM — (Reply)

  33. Loose Change was great. I thought it was the rebuttal that didn't hold up. This new ones just better.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/28 @ 11:29 AM — (Reply)

  34. It's a snoozefest.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/09/28 @ 01:26 PM — (Reply)

  35. Wow! What a party!

    Although I don't always agree with President Bush, he isn't the enemy... The Islamofacists are! The sooner we push back the Moorish invasion, the better off our country will be.

    Comment by Brooke— 2006/09/26 @ 03:00 PM — (Reply)

  36. SO BROOKE, Does that mean A: you are voting republican this year? or B: your position of weak,whimpy,appeasment, ANAYLIST THERAPY SIT IDYLY BUY AND HOPE IT GOES AWAY...MENTALITY is not serving you well????

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/26 @ 03:55 PM — (Reply)

  37. Slack is bestowed, ya know we're cool dugg.

    Comment by elmers brother— 2006/09/26 @ 05:46 PM — (Reply)

  38. Actually Dugg neocon is a term referring to jewish conservatives - hardly a bastion of nazi thought either.

    Comment by elmers brother— 2006/09/26 @ 05:48 PM — (Reply)

  39. true - i killed Christ and look what happened - btw i am the lowliest of sinners and am responsible for his death.

    tests

    Comment by nanc— 2006/09/28 @ 04:53 AM — (Reply)

  40. "She-male virgins"??? Now, that's scary!

    Comment by Always On Watch— 2006/09/28 @ 02:41 PM — (Reply)

  41. Sometimes when I listen to George Bush as he speaks and answers questions, I'm amazed that he was able to graduate from Yale. He sometimes struggles to get across the simplest of points but what I like about him is that he has a vision for America that's positive and strong. I believe that he has unwavering belief in that vision. We've no doubt had smarter presidents but I believe in him and his vision.

    Comment by American Crusader— 2006/09/29 @ 08:17 AM — (Reply)

  42. dugg...I thought it was his grandmother on his mother's side. Which would still make him a Jew since lineage is through the mother. Not that it makes any difference.

    Comment by American Crusader— 2006/09/29 @ 08:22 AM — (Reply)

  43. AC - I wholeheartedly agree with you. Sometimes I wish he was more eloquent but at least his has the courage of his convictions.

    Comment by elmers brother— 2006/09/29 @ 08:32 AM — (Reply)

  44. He graduated Yale because his family line was Skull & Bones and it gave him a free pass through life all the way to the white house.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/09/29 @ 08:51 AM — (Reply)

  45. A B.S. (don't go there) from Yale and MBA from HArvard, not bad. Of course there were smarter President's, but as I've said before, the position found the man, not the man finding the position..a la John Kerry, Al Gore, Bill Clinton who spent their whole life striving to become President. The right man for the job is there now, let's just hope the next one can come in, clean it up, and finish the job.

    Comment by Joe Gringo— 2006/09/29 @ 12:34 PM — (Reply)

  46. Good point. Who IS going to be next?

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/09/29 @ 03:41 PM — (Reply)

  47. newt......

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/29 @ 03:59 PM — (Reply)

  48. I don't think so. Too much baggage.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/09/29 @ 04:06 PM — (Reply)

  49. HHHHuuuuMMMMMMMM???????

    Comment by jim— 2006/09/29 @ 04:38 PM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are over 25 comments to this post, your eventual comment will no longer trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically