Elmer's Brother

Ahmadenijad to run for US president as a Democrat

Comment(s) »

1. Couldn't be any worse than Bush, could he? I don't think he's killed 3000 of his own people through a fake terror attack like our esteemed war monger.

   Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/15 @ 03:49 AM — (Reply)

2. THAT would have been a fantastic interview, but probably would have resulted in the interviewer being sent home in a HEAD COFFIN. Heh.
   
   Although Ahamdinejad is a madman and a politician (I know, I'm being repetitive) , he at least doesn't flip-flop and could therefore probably garner more votes than the last Democratic attempt at the White House.
   
   I picture something like this in '08...

   Comment by Brooke— 2006/08/15 @ 05:55 AM — (Reply)

3. COULDNT BE ANY WORST?, HA WAIT TILL AMEDAJEAN'S ISLAMI-GEASTOPHO PUT A KNIFE TO YOUR THROAT AND SEZ CHOSE DEATH OR MUHAMED AND ON YOUR KNEES INFIDEL,I CAN SEE YOUR WHIMP ASS SAYING OK,OK, OK I'LL BE A MUSLIM JUST DONT KILL ME,

   Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/15 @ 05:57 AM — (Reply)

4. I've been called many names but whimp ain't one of them. I beg to differ. I have the balls to stand up for my convictions and beliefs - although usually unpopular. I don't follow the herd like some cowards I know.
   
   Wait untill you face marshall law and Bush's homeland gestapo is jackbootin' down your street. Much more of a chance of that happening than Muslims ever controlling the US - And I'd die without a word before recanting my beliefs. You don't know me.
   
   p.s - I bet there are plenty of Iranians who can write english better than you.

   Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/15 @ 01:52 PM — (Reply)

5. C'MON DOUG, I CAN TELL BY WHAT YOU WRITE AND I QUOTE "I DONT BELIEVE HALF OF WHAT I WRITE HERE"

   Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/15 @ 02:31 PM — (Reply)

6. That would be the other half - the bigfoot/monsters/ufo crap that draws people in to read the true stuff.
   
   It doesn't take a conspiracy whacko to hear the owner of the WTC7 on PBS saying "We decided to pull the building", and then watch the footage of WTC7 falling and see clearly that it is an obvious controlled demolition.
   Are we supposed to believe that fire fighters went inside the burning building and rigged explosives that take over a week to plant? Or is it much more likely that they were planted there in advance?

   Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/15 @ 02:40 PM — (Reply)

7. Hey doug nice pic...family portrait?........Must reflect your personal morals

   Comment by riffran— 2007/06/05 @ 06:14 PM — (Reply)

8. hmmm...ahmadinejad - hitlery...ahmadinejad - hitlery...ahmadinejad - hitlery...
   
   nope - cannot see the difference - one of them should get the nomination.
   
   

   Comment by nanc— 2006/08/15 @ 05:15 PM — (Reply)

9. PBS exposed that crap Dugg. You'll be wearing a turban before any jack booted thug comes knocking at your door, and if he is a jack booted thug he'll be carrying the Koran, he'll smash up all your music and then honor rape your wife and children.
   
   Ahmadenijad and Iran are responsible for the most Americans killed other than Al Queda. It's common sense that drives people like me not the herd mentality. It's got to pass the reason test and "loose change" doesn't do that nor the wacky 22 years old who came up with it.

   Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/15 @ 05:19 PM — (Reply)

10. It doesn't take a conspiracy whacko to hear the owner of the WTC7 on PBS saying "We decided to pull the building", and then watch the footage of WTC7 falling and see clearly that it is an obvious controlled demolition.
    Are we supposed to believe that fire fighters went inside the burning building and rigged explosives that take over a week to plant? Or is it much more likely that they were planted there in advance?
    
    Yes it does.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/15 @ 05:33 PM — (Reply)

11. Your just refusing to admit what the evidence and proof are clearly showing you. You don't have to watch Loose Change, Elmer. Just look at the footage of the building falling. Just listen to the words coming out of the man's mouth.
    
    You're in denial.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/16 @ 02:50 AM — (Reply)

12. After Wallace and Ahmadenijad check out of the Motel 6 Wallace should give him this from HH Blowhard.
    
    How To Negotiate With Terrorists
    
    This brief blog entry takes you through a series of negotiations over time between peacemakers and terrorists:
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of a line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker introduces himself. The terrorist kills him.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker asks, "why did you kill my friend?" The terrorist kills him and rapes his wife.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker says, "Stop that!" The terrorist kills him, rapes his daughter and kills his wife.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker says, "I'll pay you $1000 if you stop attacking us." The terrorist agrees to the deal, takes the $1000, and kills him.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker appeals to the United Nations. The United Nations says the peacemaker is at fault. The terrorist kills him.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker now has a gun, and threatens to use it. Other peacemakers start chanting the old 60's whine, "Can't we all just get along?" The peacemaker hesitates. The terrorist kills him.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker tries to convince his peacemaker friends that the terrorists aren't going to respond to negotiations, but they insist that if he kills the terrorist it'll just make the other terrorists mad. The peacemaker reluctantly agrees to try negotiating again. The terrorist kills him., his entire family, and his neighbor's family.
    
    A heated debate now ensues between the peacemakers who want to be nice to the terrorists and the peacemakers who believe that there can never be peace until the terrorists are all dead. While they are debating, the terrorists kill 15 more peacemakers.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker asks himself, "Which is more important: being liked by everyone, or protecting my family?" The terrorist pulls a knife to kill the peacemaker, but the peacemaker pulls a gun and kills the terrorist first. The United Nations condemns the peacemaker's use of unproportional force. Many of his peacemaker friends turn against him.
    
    A peacemaker walks up to the left side of the line. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line. The peacemaker apologizes for what his friend did to the other terrorist. The terrorist kills him, his entire family and his neighbors, and threatens to destroy the city as soon as they develop a bigger weapon.
    
    A peacemaker refuses to meet at the line because every time a peacemaker goes to the line the terrorist kills him. A terrorist walks up to the right side of the line and fires rockets into the peacemaker's town. The United Nations condemns the way the peacemaker provoked the terrorist by refusing to come to the line and meet with him.
    
    Generations pass and not much changes until one day when the son of a peacemaker decides that the old strategy simply won't work. He walks up to the left side of the line a little early. As the terrorist approaches the right side of the line the peacemaker shoots him. Another terrorist approaches to replace the first, and the peacemaker shoots him too. This scene plays out several more times. Then a terrorist approaches carrying a white flag, but he also has weapons. The peacemaker shoots him. A terrorist next approaches with a ceasefire resolution from the U.N. The peacemaker shoots him also. A large group of terrorists approach and the peacemaker shoots them all and drops a nuclear bomb on the city they came from. The peacemaker continues killing the terrorists until the terrorists are all dead.
    
    There is finally peace on earth and the United Nations takes the credit.
    
    (No peacemakers or terrorists were harmed during the writing of this blog.)

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/15 @ 06:03 PM — (Reply)

13. MAN THAT IS ABSOLUTEY BY FAR THE BEST EXPLANATION OF HOW THIS WHOLE THING WORKS!!!!!FINALLY SOMEBODY ELSE GETS IT!!!!congrates EB

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/16 @ 03:11 AM — (Reply)

14. There are plenty of us out here azaspade.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/16 @ 03:12 AM — (Reply)

15. ITS OFTEN, SO VERY HARD TO TELL !!!!!!!!

    Comment by jim— 2006/08/16 @ 04:08 AM — (Reply)

16. Superb analysis!
    
    BTW, Green Helmet Guy was on Fox News several times yesterday. They are reporting on the contraversy. 'Bout time.

    Comment by Cate— 2006/08/16 @ 04:59 AM — (Reply)

17. EB- To continue on this vein, a conservative member of the NRA walks to the left side of the line, a terrorist walks to the right. The conservative lifts his double barrel 12 gauge, points it at the chest of the terrorist and says "Let's talk!", The terrorist spouts off, the conservative shoots him and waits for the next with the same comment. Eventually, realizing there are no sane terrorists, he gets together with his fellow conservatives, bombs Mecca, Medina and bulldozes the Temple Mount, when allah doesn't show up, they send in Christian missionaries to convert the confused souls to the true G*D, fewer were killed and those left are turned to productive loving people! The difference between leftistas and Christians, deal with reality as it is or muck around, get everyone irritated, angry and a lot more dead! Hmmm? Think I like the one where fewer are killed in the long run!
    Good morning, G*D bless and Maranatha!
    
    tmw

    Comment by the merry widow— 2006/08/16 @ 12:23 AM — (Reply)

18. Oooops! Conservative not Christian, in the difference between leftistas and...should be more careful before full coffee consumption!
    
    tmw
    
    peruse

    Comment by — 2006/08/16 @ 02:00 AM — (Reply)

19. EB, that sounds about right...
    
    When someone's primary goal is to use the blood of the 'infidel' (ie: NOT MUSLIM) as a ticket to Paradise, and as a culture glorifies death more than life, they CANNOT be reasoned with?
    
    Would a sane person try to reason with a hungry cougar? Trying to reason with a Muslim will get the same result!

    Comment by Brooke— 2006/08/16 @ 02:26 AM — (Reply)

20. Well the holiest book in Judaism, the Talmud clearly states that all non jews are animals. That jews are allowed to kill/steal/cheat/and lie to non jews - but if you were to hit a jew it is the same as hitting God. Also it says Jesus burns in Hell. Hmmm - maybe the Muslims aren't the only religious fanatics over there that hate Christians. Maybe they're just honest about what they believe and the jews hate you more covertly so as to have you're allegiance in wiping out there other enemies.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/17 @ 03:57 AM — (Reply)

21. Refusing to believe what Dugg..a bunch of conjecture and half truths. Why do support people clearly want to destroy us? While believing some cockamamy story about how the government set about to kill us in some as yet proven scheme to bring about a NWO or some other conspiracy? They can't even keep my VA records safe, what makes you think they can hold this huge conspiracy together for some as yet unnamed purpose? And if so it started way before Bush..so your hatred of Bush can only go so far.
    
    The Bible says to pray for our leaders. I suggest you start there..Republican, Democrat whatever they are. Dealing with the Islamofascists is no easy task. They could use the Lord's help.
    
    Reason.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/16 @ 03:10 AM — (Reply)

22. EB is hot this morning

    Comment by jim— 2006/08/16 @ 04:16 AM — (Reply)

23. Hitler's ideas didn't originate with Hitler - Elmer. We still hate him. We still hate Bush the traitor who let his own people die as an excuse to start WWIII.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/17 @ 04:00 AM — (Reply)

24. And conjecture? I think you're just burying your head in the sand.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/17 @ 04:01 AM — (Reply)

25. It's funny Dugg you call it denial I call it delusional. You're more apt to support the very people who are trying to kill us while believing that your own countrymen are up to no good, including your Christian brothers and sisters.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/17 @ 04:52 AM — (Reply)

26. Not all of my country men - just a small cell of lunatics that have seized control through a rigged vote.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/17 @ 01:21 PM — (Reply)

27. No, the correct term is "Hawt!" LOL!

    Comment by brooke— 2006/08/16 @ 04:29 AM — (Reply)

28. hawt

    Comment by jim— 2006/08/16 @ 04:51 AM — (Reply)

29. tell tha truth brutha

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/16 @ 03:36 PM — (Reply)

30. I don't plan to become an islamifascist anytime soon and they can't make me. It might be a good idea to start keeping an eye on the buffer zone between them and us. Once they swallow France the rest of the way, perhaps certain Americans may wake up. My liberal friends have castigated my President (and theirs) while exonerating the thugs from the middle east. Too much pot smoking in their younger years I suppose.
    

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/08/16 @ 03:18 PM — (Reply)

31. younger years,,, whats that burning inda ask tray

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/16 @ 03:49 PM — (Reply)

32. its out, its out already

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/16 @ 04:13 PM — (Reply)

33. Barry they are definitely smoking something, I don't understand it. Hate America and defend those who are trying to destroy us? Did you hear about Jimmy Carter's interview in Der Speigel?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/16 @ 04:17 PM — (Reply)

34. Wasn't Jimmy Carter the president when it was OK for Americans to be held prisoner in Iran? What does that say for him? Perot may have been a little fruity, but he did get those Americans out.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/08/16 @ 04:23 PM — (Reply)

35. Hey Mike Wallace....what about Hitler? Was he an interesting man? What about your old lying pal Dan Rather...another interesting man?

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/08/16 @ 04:24 PM — (Reply)

36. The problem with the gov't. right now is that all of the hippies from the 60's are running 1/2 of it right now... Hell, one of them just made a failed bid for the Presidency in '04! We've all seen those pics of Kerry sitting next to Fonda at 'peace rallies'!
    
    We need to get 'em out!

    Comment by Brooke— 2006/08/17 @ 01:42 AM — (Reply)

37. Thats absolutely correct Brooke, 1/2 the persons in office are "OLD" hippies, "BURNED OUT" from the 60's !! They are the ones who are now responsible for this "LINE" of thought that sez " Maybe we can pay thier blackmail money (well call it AID)so they'll leave us alone", " Dumb acid heads, took too many trips without leaving the farm"

    Comment by jim— 2006/08/17 @ 04:11 AM — (Reply)

38. Hippy appeasers...Kerry met with the N. Vietnamese didn't he?

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/17 @ 04:53 AM — (Reply)

39. tisk tisk tisk

    Comment by aza spade— 2006/08/17 @ 11:39 AM — (Reply)

40. I rather imagine that Ahmadinejad enjoyed toying with a Jew. Mike Wallace considers himself a "reform Jew."
    
    BTW, Ahmadinejad now has a blog. No kidding!

    Comment by Always On Watch— 2006/08/17 @ 03:40 PM — (Reply)

41. Who do you think writes his blog? Dan Rather of course. That ho will do anything for attention and money.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/08/17 @ 03:48 PM — (Reply)

42. tinfoil hat

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/18 @ 02:28 PM — (Reply)

43. Dugg let's say for the sake of argument that the Talmud does say those things. Would you agree that actions speak louder than words?
    
    In Israel Jews, Christians, Muslims, Druze you name it live together in a Democratic nation. How many Jews have you seen on TV beheading Christians? How many Jews have you seen hijacking planes and flying them into buildings? (I know cue "Loose Change"). How many Jews do you see gathering by the millions chanting "Death to America"? Death to the Crusaders (read Christians)? The fact is you don't see that. There are many many Jews, (Dennis Prager, Michael Medved just to name a couple) who care deeply about the relationship between Jews and Christians. It's one thing to disagree with someone based on their religion it's quite another to want to IMPOSE your religion on someone e.g. radical Islam. That's why people refer to it as Islamofascism. I suggest you call the KKK and see what kind of anti-Semitic propaganda you might pick up that falls into all your conspiracy theories. Perhaps start with David Duke. There is an example of so-called Christians who wanted to kill Jews and blacks.
    
    Yet in Muslim countries you can't build a church for e.g. in Egypt. Christians are made to pay a heavy tax called the jizya. Christians have left a lot of these countries in droves (Lebanon) and the Islamo fascists thugs (Hezbollah) have become the majority.
    
    Now give me lets say three examples of Jews killing Christians in the last two years by beheading, suicide bombing or plane hijacking. I promise to send you a prize.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/18 @ 02:47 PM — (Reply)

44. Anti-semetic would include anything against Arabs since they are all equally semetic peoples just like the Jews.
    The Talmud does say these things - you can read it yourself and see. You'll also find in the Koran Jesus refered to as a holy prophet.
    Christians are persecuted in Israel - albeit not beheaded - just spit on and called slang names.
    I'm not trying to say Muslims are our friends - I know they hate us - but I'm saying Jews hate us as well and just are smart enough to lie about it (it's in the Talmud that they're supposed to lie to gentile animals)
    Two years? I don't know. But there was the attack on the USS Liberty. Many suspect (know) involvment in 911, not to mention there are many who believe that at least some of the beheadings filmed by Arabs were really false flag Mossad operations - since one of the "Arab" terrorists in one of the videos had a Star of David tattoo and another held an Israeli rifle. But I know - tinfoil hat/conspiracy whacko/X-file theme.

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/18 @ 04:40 PM — (Reply)

45. Uh oh Dugg. You seem to be at a loss on that last one. I can't imagine you not even coming up with a fake conspiracy theory in response to EB's ?.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/08/18 @ 04:50 PM — (Reply)

46. Aren't you missing Hannity?

    Comment by Dugg— 2006/08/18 @ 04:52 PM — (Reply)

47. psssst....YOU may need Al Franken to tell you what to think but the insipid drivel I write is all mine. HAHAHAHAHAHA

    Comment by Barry G.— 2006/08/18 @ 05:08 PM — (Reply)

48. Dugg the minute Judaism tells me to convert or die I will fight against it. The Bible says anyone who blesses Israel will be blessed.
    
    BTW the Muslim Jesus is a far cry from the Christian one. They see Him as a prophet but NOT the Son of God. I invite you to read this and this.

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/19 @ 04:06 AM — (Reply)

49. From Russetshadows:
    
    A quote from Israeli Prime Minister Olmert -
    
    This simple sentence sums up the entire conflict and indeed, the entire war against terror:
    
    "The difference between us and Hezbollah is that when we kill innocent people we consider it a failure, when they kill innocent people they consider it a success."
    

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/19 @ 04:24 AM — (Reply)

50. I meant to tell you Dugg the Talmud is rabbinic commentary.
    
    This usually refers to the Babylonian Talmud which was completed about 500 CE. It is a collection of the discussions and decisions of the Rabbis from about 300 to 500 CE. These discussions were an elaboration and clarification of the laws of the Mishnah, which formed the basis of Talmudic debates. The Palestinian Talmud (300-400 CE) is a less influential work as the discussions were cut short by persecutions.
    
    These are different than scriptures. As you well know there are many Christian commentaries but they don't reach the level of scripture. Therefore do not have to be followed.
    

    Comment by Elmers Brother— 2006/08/19 @ 11:58 AM — (Reply)

51. I apologize for that unwarrented comment duggy....that was an unprofessional shot on my part....I just can't help but ridicule people who actually beleive that conspiracy b.s....let go of the dnc/lib/conspiracy hate it's just plain bad for your health....ps we really did land on the moon

    Comment by riffran— 2007/06/05 @ 06:37 PM — (Reply)

52. Those idiots would vote for him. Poor Hillary.
    
    

    Comment by Ernie Els— 2007/07/14 @ 09:05 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment

Name

E-mail

URL

Notify me on new comments.

[ Top level ] #1: Dugg on 2006/08/15 06:49 AM#2: Brooke on 2006/08/15 08:55 AM#3: aza spade on 2006/08/15 08:57 AM#4: Dugg on 2006/08/15 04:52 PM#5: aza spade on 2006/08/15 05:31 PM#6: Dugg on 2006/08/15 05:40 PM#7: nanc on 2006/08/15 08:15 PM#8: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/15 08:19 PM#9: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/15 08:33 PM#10: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/15 09:03 PM#11: the merry widow on 2006/08/16 03:23 AM#12: on 2006/08/16 05:00 AM#13: Brooke on 2006/08/16 05:26 AM   #14: Dugg on 2006/08/16 05:50 AM#15: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/16 06:10 AM   #16: aza spade on 2006/08/16 06:11 AM      #17: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/16 06:12 AM         #18: jim on 2006/08/16 07:08 AM   #19: jim on 2006/08/16 07:16 AM#20: brooke on 2006/08/16 07:29 AM   #21: jim on 2006/08/16 07:51 AM   #22: Cate on 2006/08/16 07:59 AM#23: Barry G. on 2006/08/16 06:18 PM      #24: aza spade on 2006/08/16 06:36 PM   #25: aza spade on 2006/08/16 06:49 PM      #26: aza spade on 2006/08/16 07:13 PM#27: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/16 07:17 PM#28: Barry G. on 2006/08/16 07:23 PM#29: Barry G. on 2006/08/16 07:24 PM#30: Brooke on 2006/08/17 04:42 AM   #31: Dugg on 2006/08/17 06:57 AM   #32: Dugg on 2006/08/17 07:00 AM      #33: Dugg on 2006/08/17 07:01 AM   #34: jim on 2006/08/17 07:11 AM         #35: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/17 07:52 AM#36: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/17 07:53 AM   #37: aza spade on 2006/08/17 02:39 PM            #38: Dugg on 2006/08/17 04:21 PM#39: Always On Watch on 2006/08/17 06:40 PM#40: Barry G. on 2006/08/17 06:48 PM#41: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/18 05:28 PM#42: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/18 05:47 PM#43: Dugg on 2006/08/18 07:40 PM#44: Barry G. on 2006/08/18 07:50 PM#45: Dugg on 2006/08/18 07:52 PM#46: Barry G. on 2006/08/18 08:08 PM#47: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/19 07:06 AM#48: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/19 07:24 AM#49: Elmers Brother on 2006/08/19 02:58 PM   #50: riffran on 2007/06/05 09:14 PM#51: riffran on 2007/06/05 09:37 PM#52: Ernie Els on 2007/07/14 12:05 PM — reply to this comment.

Your Comment

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image:
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

• Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
• Since there already are over 25 comments to this post, your eventual comment will no longer trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
• The line and paragraph breaks automatically