Radical Islam Surrenders to Progressivism
| The War on Terror has entered a new successful stage once the US field commanders began to force the enemy units to comply with the same government-imposed rules and restrictions that the US Army increasingly faces on a daily basis. One man, identified only as a "Soldier for Allah" explained, "We were led into a classroom and had to sit in circles for what they called 'Collective Self-Attaining Support Sessions' where they lectured us on matters such as "Gender Awareness." "Multicultural Identity." and "Environmental Racism." For the love of Allah (peace be upon him and his messenger, the Prophet Muhammad), even in Saddam's prisons, I was never accused so often of being guilty!" |
Inspired by this success, the US Senate voted 90 to 9 in support of Sen. McCain's bill to ban inhumane treatment of captured terrorists. Echoing that decision, Pentagon officials also released a new directive on Defense Department intelligence interrogations, mandating that all questioning of detainees in U.S. military custody include "humane" treatment and that interrogators can no longer "inflict suffering, harm, pain, or any kind of inconvenience on enemy combatants." The directive ostensibly reduces the military's tactics to what the ACLU has called "progressive engagement similar to what one would expect as a disinterested actor." Although this directive is incoherent, a majority of lawyers believe that it means, "enemies must be treated as though they are United States civilians." Despite grim predictions by Republican politicians and conservative pundits, the new progressive tactics have turned more effective in defeating the enemy than conventional combat had ever been. To wit, most radical Islamic groups in Iraq and Afghanistan have surrendered to the United States after being compelled to live under U.S.-mandated "progressive" laws.
As one Iraqi insurgent put it, "We can withstand your guns and tanks, but please, kill us all before you inflict more sensitivity training!" In fact, the very thought of such punishments has made even the most battle-hardened insurgents whimper for mercy.
In fact , Diversity requirements have been among the most effective
weapons wielded by the Americans. An army officer pointed out, "The
enemy needs to understand that they must meet our goals and timetables.
That is, if you're a terrorist and you shoot at us, we're gonna speak
with you. And if your terrorist group doesn't meet our
minority-and-women representation requirements, you're gonna be filling
out forms for the rest of your days.
"We also check for other signs of discrimination. Were the correct percentage of your weapons built by approved minority vendors? Were your explosive belts manufactured by non-union labor? Were you using hurtful language while you were tossing grenades at us? Is everyone in your death squad being treated equally? These things matter more to us than whether you kill our troops. You see, individuals are replaceable, but our progressive philosophy is sacrosanct. And if you attack our philosophy, you're going to be explaining yourself in remedial education sessions and you're going to be doing a lot...and I mean a lot...of writing!"
The war is not over, though, as Osama bin Laden is still in hiding. In a taped message, he said, "I will surrender if the United States promises to overlook my family's lack of compliance with WBE and MBE requirements in their construction business." However, military experts believe that is an irrelevant point. Said one, "We don't care about his family. But he has led an organization that is guilty of de facto religious discrimination. If you're going to butcher Americans, you had better do it with a diverse group of murderers. Al Qaeda is comprised only of Muslims, and that's wrong. We're going to find Mr. Bin Laden, and he will definitely learn what it means to meet diversity goals." |
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically
Get this....our pal Shalana is deleting any post I put on her site. Personally if I were you, I would boycott her site and move on. She is a control freak.
Comment by are you kidding?— 2005/11/21 @ 01:39 AM — (Reply)
Comment by C-Mom— 2005/11/21 @ 06:58 AM — (Reply)
Comment by C-Mom— 2005/11/21 @ 07:37 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/11/21 @ 02:00 PM — (Reply)
Even the strongest among them couldn't take the sensitivity training and as soon as the sexual harrassment lecture came up they all begged to surrender. Even Lover of Angels.
Comment by elmers brother— 2005/11/21 @ 04:02 PM — (Reply)
OK....I want in on this! WHO is 'shalana'???
Comment by Gravelrash— 2005/11/23 @ 11:38 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/11/23 @ 12:05 PM — (Reply)
Actually, I love the gal. She could become my third Muslim wife,inshallah.
Comment by Lover of Angels— 2005/11/23 @ 04:53 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/11/24 @ 05:58 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Lover of Angels— 2005/11/24 @ 06:57 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/11/24 @ 07:54 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Lover of Angels— 2005/11/24 @ 08:43 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/11/24 @ 09:27 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Lover of Angels— 2005/11/24 @ 09:53 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Elmers Brother— 2005/11/24 @ 09:56 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Lover of Angels— 2005/11/24 @ 11:28 AM — (Reply)